jump to navigation

Advantages of NTFS partition February 18, 2008

Posted by Vijay in Education, Technology.
add a comment

The NTFS file system, introduced with first version of Windows NT, is a completely different file system from FAT. It provides increased security, file–by–file compression, quotas, and even encryption. It is the default file system for new installations of Windows XP, and if you’re doing an upgrade from a previous version of Windows, you’ll be asked if you want to convert your existing file systems to NTFS. Its a default requirement for Windows Vista. You can convert FAT16 or FAT32 volumes to NTFS at any point. Just remember that you can’t easily go back to FAT or FAT32 (without reformatting the drive or partition), and i bet you wont think of it. For this reason, many system administrators, myself included, used to recommend that users format at least a small partition at the beginning of their main hard disk as FAT. But with the enhanced recovery abilities built into Windows XP (more on that in a future column), I don’t think it’s necessary or desirable to create that initial FAT partition.

When to Use FAT or FAT32?

If you’re running more than one operating system on a single computer (Dual OS), you will definitely need to format some of your volumes as FAT. Any programs or data that need to be accessed by more than one operating system on that computer should be stored on a FAT16 or possibly FAT32 volume. But keep in mind that you have no security for data on a FAT16 or FAT32 volume and any one with access to the computer can read, change, or even delete any file that is stored on a FAT16 or FAT32 partition. So do not store personal files on partitions formatted with FAT file systems.


Its recommended to use NTFS rather than FAT when you have an individual system.

Why AMD beats Intel? February 5, 2008

Posted by Vijay in Technology.
Tags: , ,
add a comment

In January 2008, I bought a 2.1Ghz AMD Athlon X2 4000+(2.4K bux) with ASUS motherboard(2.5K bux) and also Transcend 2GB DDR2 RAM(1.7K bux). Actually I went to buy only a 1GB DDR RAM for 1.5K bux and the store wala told me that only DDR2 RAM are in current trend and the prices of DDR RAM might be double the prices of DDR2 RAM. So it opted me to buy a new motherboard compatible for DDR2 RAM and a processor of low budget in the AMD Athlon X2 Series. AMD is always has a price tag of 300 to 500 bux less than the Intel products. And now its working very well. Later, i saw that my configuration is the mid-range in the gaming arena and felt pretty happy about it.

According to a benchmark test with 2.4Ghz AMD Athlon 4800+ chip and 3.2Ghz Intel Pentium dual core Express Edition, AMD Athlon dual core is rated as the best in all aspects with Intel and it provides a simultaneous 32bit and 64bit tasking. Intel was a bit late to the 64bit technology, only a year later after AMD introduced Athlon 64bit technology. While in Intel only a few processors are of 64bit technology and it was a drawback in the cold war between them. I could experience a better gaming performance with my AMD Athlon X2 4000+ and ATI Radeon X550 256MB DDR technology. There were many faults in AMD a few years ago that the processors get heated up very quickly. But these are rectified and they have introduced the Cool and Quiet Technology in the recent times. Though Intel has the best processors, they are slightly costly and everyone cannot afford it.

I recommand AMD as the best value for your money…


CNET Prizefight between the Dual Core Desktops : AMD vs Intel



The prices of the products may flectuate from city to city.